netdev - Re: [PATCH] firewire net: Ensure checksumming in upper layer.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50FC0353.8090902@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:46:43 +0100
From:	Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire net: Ensure checksumming in upper layer.


>> Indeed neither the device nor the lower drivers check protocol checksums.
>> But the CRCs of the encapsulating 1394 packets are checked in hardware.
>> Shall protocol checksums be verified regardless?
>
> Yes, because packets may come from off-link source.
>

Hm, I can't see any off-link packets coming from 
fwnet_finish_incoming_packet()

So I wont verify checksums in the driver.

Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html