[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FD1592.2000907@monom.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:16:50 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: net_cls: fd passed in SCM_RIGHTS datagram not set
correctly
On 21.01.2013 10:54, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/1/21 17:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
>>
>> Commit 6a328d8c6f03501657ad580f6f98bf9a42583ff7 changed the update
>> logic for the socket but it does not update the SCM_RIGHTS update
>> as well. This patch is based on the net_prio fix commit
>>
>> 48a87cc26c13b68f6cce4e9d769fcb17a6b3e4b8
>>
>> net: netprio: fd passed in SCM_RIGHTS datagram not set correctly
>>
>> A socket fd passed in a SCM_RIGHTS datagram was not getting
>> updated with the new tasks cgrp prioidx. This leaves IO on
>> the socket tagged with the old tasks priority.
>>
>> To fix this add a check in the scm recvmsg path to update the
>> sock cgrp prioidx with the new tasks value.
>>
>> Let's apply the same fix for net_cls.
>>
>> Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
>
> Acutally I didn't report this.
You made me look into this, so you reported it at least in my eyes :)
> I was about to send exactly the same
> patch and then I noticed the shared socket issue. ;)
I don't mind if you want your patch to be applied. I just felt
responsible for the changes I did.
thanks,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists