netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] et131x: Promote staging et131x driver to drivers/net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130122062010.GA16282@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:20:10 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] et131x: Promote staging et131x driver to
 drivers/net

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:44:55PM +0000, Mark Einon wrote:
> On 19 January 2013 11:03, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > et131x_get_regs() has endian bugs calling et131x_mii_read().
> >
> </snip>
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Could you be a bit more descriptive about the issues you think there
> are with these calls?
> 

Sorry, that was sloppy on my part.  Here's what I meant:

	et131x_mii_read(adapter, MII_BMCR, (u16 *)&regs_buff[num++]);

That puts the number in the 2 high bits which works for little
endian systems but not for big endian.  It should be something like:

	u16 tmp;

	et131x_mii_read(adapter, MII_BMCR, &tmp);
	regs_buff[num++] = tmp;

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html