netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] ISDN patches for net-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50FE4C92.3060103@imap.cc>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:23:46 +0100
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	isdn@...ux-pingi.de, hjlipp@....de, keil@...systems.de,
	i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ISDN patches for net-next

Am 21.01.2013 23:38, schrieb David Miller:
> Patches 1-5 applied to net-next, patch 6 applied to 'net' and queued
> up for -stable.

Thanks.

> We don't have changes bypass 'net' and go into stable from net-next
> like you intended.  We also don't use CC: stable for networking
> patches, you ask me to queue them up into my -stable patch queue
> for networking instead.

I see. Is there somewhere I can read up on the workflow for networking
patches and how it fits in with the general plan of things?

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html