[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kdoibl$978$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unix Socket buffer attribution
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 at 02:01 GMT, Yannick Koehler <yannick@...hler.name> wrote:
>
> I believe that the problem is that once we move the skb into the
> client's receive queue we need to decrease the sk_wmem_alloc variable
> of the server socket since that skb is no more tied to the server.
> The code should then account for this memory as part of the
> sk_rmem_alloc variable on the client's socket. The function
> "skb_set_owner_r(skb,owner)" would seem to be the function to do that,
> so it would seem to me.
Something like below??
-------->
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 0c61236..e273072 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ restart:
unix_state_unlock(sk);
+ skb_set_owner_r(skb, other);
/* take ten and and send info to listening sock */
spin_lock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
__skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
@@ -1578,6 +1579,7 @@ restart:
if (sock_flag(other, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP))
__net_timestamp(skb);
+ skb_set_owner_r(skb, other);
maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
if (max_level > unix_sk(other)->recursion_level)
@@ -1693,6 +1695,7 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
(other->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN))
goto pipe_err_free;
+ skb_set_owner_r(skb, other);
maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
if (max_level > unix_sk(other)->recursion_level)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists