netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130123154525.9f1bd6652f13f2a7a8202bf6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:45:25 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

Hi Greg,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c between commit f9a8f83b04e0 ("net: phy:
remove flags argument from phy_{attach, connect, connect_direct}") from
the net-next tree and commit 26ef1021c1c7 ("staging: et131x: Modify block
comments to fit with networking style") from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (the former adjusted the white space in the same was as the
latter, so I used thet) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is
required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped