[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358903293.12374.492.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:08:13 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] IP_GRE: Linearize skb before csum.
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> We don't emit crap onto the wire knowingly. Jesse is right.
>
> If you want to do software GSO in situations where we know that the
> paged data cannot be modified asynchronously, you'll have to
> explicitly support that.
>
> I will not accept us saying that allowing the emission of bad
> checksums is OK. It never is. That's terrible behavior, and creates
> impossible to disagnose problems.
How is this related to GRE only ?
We have dozen of skb_checksum_help() calls that basically have the same
issue.
Am I missing some obvious thing ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists