netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: fec: add napi support to improve proformance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHrpEqQ3-prqJaCmt1hfOr4GzDVyuRNvko1SCyQZHdALhHkhkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:44:53 +0800
From:	Frank Li <lznuaa@...il.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	B38611@...escale.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: fec: add napi support to improve proformance

> This comment seems rather unnecessary. Also it should be
>
>         /* space left and right /*
>
> devicetree bindings should use '-' instead of '_'. The binding
> Documentation should be in the patch adding the bindings. Also
> make sure the devicetree parsing is outside of the path for platform
> based probing.
>
> With this particular binding I'm unsure it should exist anyway since
> it's configuration rather than hardware description. The devicetree
> normally is for hardware description only.
>

What's your opinion?
Using module parameter, device-tree to config it or the other method?

best regards
Frank Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html