[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FF9836.4060106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:58:46 +0800
From: Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Bruce Curtis <brutus@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: v3 for tcp friends?
于 2013年01月23日 15:21, Li Yu 写道:
> 于 2013年01月23日 14:46, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:12 +0800, Li Yu wrote:
>>> Oops, this hang is not since TCP friends patch!
>>>
>>> sk_sndbuf_get() is broken by 32 bits integer overflow
>>> because of so large value in net.ipv4.tcp_{rmem,wmem}.
>>>
>>> but this hang also can be found in net-next.git
>>> (3.8.0-rc3+), if we run below commands, then all new
>>> TCP connections stop working!
>>>
>>> # when TCP friends is disabled
>>> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096 4294967296 4294967296" # 4GB
>>> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4096 4294967296 4294967296"
>>
>> Right we need to make sure we dont overflow.
>>
>> Try the following fix :
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>> index a25e1d2..1459145 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>> @@ -549,14 +549,16 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_table[] = {
>> .data = &sysctl_tcp_wmem,
>> .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_tcp_wmem),
>> .mode = 0644,
>> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec
>> + .extra1 = &zero,
>> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax
>> },
>> {
>> .procname = "tcp_rmem",
>> .data = &sysctl_tcp_rmem,
>> .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_tcp_rmem),
>> .mode = 0644,
>> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec
>> + .extra1 = &zero,
>> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax
>> },
>> {
>> .procname = "tcp_app_win",
>>
>>
>>
> Thanks for so quick reply, I will test it soon.
>
> however I suspect whether this patch could fix overflow if we merged TCP
> friends patch in future.
>
Tested on 3.7.0-rc1+, but bug is still alive
with disabled TCP friends ...
Thanks
Yu
> With TCP friends, we have source like below, or TCP friends should care
> this ?
>
> static inline int sk_sndbuf_get(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> if (sk->sk_friend)
> return sk->sk_sndbuf + sk->sk_friend->sk_rcvbuf;
> else
> return sk->sk_sndbuf;
> }
>
> static inline bool sk_stream_memory_free(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> return sk_wmem_queued_get(sk) < sk_sndbuf_get(sk);
> }
>
> So sk_sndbuf_get() still may be overflow when we have right value in
> net.ipv4.tcp_{rmem,wmem}.
>
> Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists