Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:03:12 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Lieven <pl@...net.de>
Cc:	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tap devices not receiving packets from a bridge

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>>is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare circumstances stops
> >>>>a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
> >>>>
> >>>>My problem occurs in conjunction with vanilla qemu-kvm-1.2.0 and Ubuntu Kernel 3.2.0-34.53
> >>>>which is based on Linux 3.2.33.
> >>>>
> >>>>I was not yet able to reproduce the issue, it happens in really rare cases. The symptom is that
> >>>>the tap does not have any TX packets. RX is working fine. I see the packets coming in at
> >>>>the physical interface on the host, but they are not forwarded to the tap interface.
> >>>>The bridge itself has learnt the mac address of the vServer that is connected to the tap interface.
> >>>>It does not help to toggle the bridge link status,  the tap interface status or the interface in the vServer.
> >>>>It seems that problem occurs if a tap interface that has previously been used, but set to nonpersistent
> >>>>is set persistent again and then is by chance assigned to the same vServer (=same mac address on same
> >>>>bridge) again. Unfortunately it seems not to be reproducible.
> >>>
> >>>Not sure but this patch from Michael Tsirkin may help - it solves an
> >>>issue with persistent tap devices:
> >>>
> >>>http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/198598/
> >>
> >>Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >>thanks for the pointer. I have seen this patch, but I have neglected it because it was dealing
> >>with persistent taps. But maybe the taps in the kernel are not deleted directly.
> >>Can you remember what the syptomps of the above issue have been? Sorry for
> >>being vague, but I currently have no clue whats going on.
> >>
> >>Can someone who has more internal knowledge of the bridging/tap code say if qemu can
> >>be responsible at all if the tap device is not receiving packets from the bridge.
> >>
> >>If I have the following config. Lets say packets coming in via physical interface eth1.123,
> >>and a bridge called br123.I further have a virtual machine with tap0. Both eth1.123
> >>and tap0 are member of br123.
> >>
> >>If the issue occurs the vServer has no network connectivity inbound. If I sent a ping
> >>from the vServer I see it on tap0 and leaving on eth1.123. I see further the arp reply coming
> >>in via eth1.123, but the reply can't be seen on tap0.
> >>
> >>Peter
> >
> >If guest is not consuming packets, a TX queue in tap device
> >will with time overrun (there's space for 1000 packets there).
> >This is code from tun:
> >
> >         if (skb_queue_len(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue)
> >                           >= dev->tx_queue_len / tun->numqueues){
> >                 if (!(tun->flags & TUN_ONE_QUEUE)) {
> >                         /* Normal queueing mode. */
> >                         /* Packet scheduler handles dropping of further
> >  * packets. */
> >                         netif_stop_subqueue(dev, txq);
> >
> >                         /* We won't see all dropped packets
> >  * individually, so overrun
> >                          * error is more appropriate. */
> >                         dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> >
> >
> >So you can detect that this triggered by looking at fifo errors counter in device.
> >
> >Once this happens TX queue is stopped, then you hit this path:
> >
> >                         if (!netif_xmit_stopped(txq)) {
> >                                 __this_cpu_inc(xmit_recursion);
> >                                 rc = dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev, txq);
> >                                 __this_cpu_dec(xmit_recursion);
> >                                 if (dev_xmit_complete(rc)) {
> >                                         HARD_TX_UNLOCK(dev, txq);
> >                                         goto out;
> >                                 }
> >                         }
> >
> >so packets are not passed to device anymore.
> >It will stay this way until guest consumes some packets and
> >queue is restarted.
> 
> After some time I again have a vServer in this state. It seems not like there
> are no TX errors.
> 
> # ifconfig tap10
> tap10     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 7a:59:20:6f:e7:e5
>           inet6 addr: fe80::7859:20ff:fe6f:e7e5/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:197431 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:264309 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:2 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:13842063 (13.8 MB)  TX bytes:35092821 (35.0 MB)
> 
> It seems like the bridge is not forwarding any packets to the tap device anymore altough it has learnt
> the MAC-Adresses and there are also broadcast packets coming in.
> 
> Any more ideas where I could debug?
> 
> Peter
> 
> >
> >>>
> >>>Stefan

Hmm. So there are two overrun errors that triggered, so
it's possible after the second one the queue got stuck in an xoff state.
You'd have to use something like systemtap or kdb to poke at the
queue state to see whether xoff flag is set and/or look
at the receive queue length.

For future, we can try to set TUN_ONE_QUEUE flag on the interface,
or try applying this patch
5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
in kernel see if this helps.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists