[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51007e6c.4170ec0a.7218.18c2@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:20:52 -0400
From: Jamie Gloudon <jamie.gloudon@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] via-rhine: add 64bit statistics.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:02:52PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 19:55 -0400, Jamie Gloudon wrote:
>
> > Eric, do you mean like this below? If not, please illustrate.
> >
> > + netdev_stats_to_stats64(stats, &dev->stats);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rp->rx_stats.syncp);
> > + stats->rx_packets = rp->rx_stats.packets;
> > + stats->rx_bytes = rp->rx_stats.bytes;
> > + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rp->rx_stats.syncp, start));
> > +
> > + do {
> > + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rp->tx_stats.syncp);
> > + stats->tx_packets = rp->tx_stats.packets;
> > + stats->tx_bytes = rp->tx_stats.bytes;
> > + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rp->tx_stats.syncp, start));
> > +
> > + return stats;
> >
>
> Yes, this is exactly how you should do that, since
> netdev_stats_to_stats64(stats, &dev->stats); would overwrite
> {tr}x_packets, {tr}x_bytes anyway.
>
>
Right. Also, I added rx_dropped to increment for oversize ethernet. Is
that valid?
@@ -1857,6 +1869,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int
limit)
"Oversized Ethernet frame %p vs %p\n", rp->rx_head_desc, &rp->rx_ring[entry]);
+ dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists