[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130124135508.GE16641@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:55:08 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ipv6: add anti-spoofing checks for 6to4 and 6rd
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59:30PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> I need to do more research. I am still not convinced
> to have such destination check here because the standard
> seems silent about it, and we have several basic checks
> in standard input path and tunnel search.
Thanks, looking forward to your conclusion.
> Anyway, try_6rd() can do check for prefix as well
> but we are doing slightly different thing.
> So I think we can introduce new __check_6rd() to
> return non-6rd/6to4 addresses.
>
> bool __check_6rd(struct ip_tunnel *tunnel,
> const struct in6_addr *v6dst,
> __be32 *v4dst);
>
> If prefix matches, fill *v4dst and return true.
> Otherwise, return false.
>
> __be32 __try_6rd()
> {
> __be32 dst = 0;
> __check_6rd(tunnel, v6dst, &dst);
> return dst;
> }
I'll update the patch and send it over for review, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists