netdev - Re: [patch net-next V2] bond: have random dev address by default instead of zeroes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542237717.4200599.1359136587903.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:56:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	Pavel Simerda <psimerda@...hat.com>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andy@...yhouse.net,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, dcbw@...hat.com,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next V2] bond: have random dev address by default
 instead of zeroes

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@...ibm.com>
> but I don't think it should be changed.

Just a short question. Is there any reason for bonding interfaces to behave differently from bridging interfaces in this respect?

Cheers,

Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html