netdev - Re: [patch net-next V2] bond: have random dev address by default instead of zeroes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130125072221.GB1659@minipsycho.orion>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:22:21 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andy@...yhouse.net,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, psimerda@...hat.com, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next V2] bond: have random dev address by default
 instead of zeroes

Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:37:13AM CET, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:01AM CET, fubar@...ibm.com wrote:
>>Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>
>>>Makes more sense to have randomly generated address by default than to
>>>have all zeroes. It also allows user to for example put the bond into
>>>bridge without need to have any slaves in it.
>>>
>>>Also note that this changes only behaviour of bonds with no slaves. Once
>>>the first slave device is enslaved, its address will be used (no change
>>>here).


Also, this is not entirely true now. Example:

eth1 has 52:54:00:b8:30:0b

# ip link add bondx address 22:33:44:55:66:77 type bond
# ip link set eth1 master bondx

Now both bondx and eth1 has 22:33:44:55:66:77

Shouldn't both have 52:54:00:b8:30:0b ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html