[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51061385.9070108@hartkopp.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:58:29 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: mkl@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: can-next 2013-01-26
On 28.01.2013 06:24, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:09:07 +0100
>
>> this is a pull-request for net-next/master. There is are 9 patches by
>> Fabio Baltieri and Kurt Van Dijck which add LED infrastructure and
>> support for CAN devices. Bernd Krumboeck adds a driver for the USB CAN
>> adapter from 8 devices. Oliver Hartkopp improves the CAN gateway
>> functionality. There are 4 patches by me, which clean up the CAN's
>> Kconfig.
>
> Pulled, although:
>
> 1) You need to create an accessor helper for that can_skb_priv
> thing, every access to it is that horrible cast expression.
Ok, will do.
>
> 2) There is no reason to accomodate out of tree stuff, and for that
> reason I see no reason why you should need that headroom size
> check at all.
>
> Either the driver uses alloc_can_skb() or it does it's own SKB
> allocation and in-tree you've fixed that.
>
> You're just asking for trouble by trying to accomodate out of
> tree guys anyways, why if they create a headroom that happens
> to be the size of can_skb_priv. See what a joke that test is?
> It's not really protecting fully against anything.
I see.
I'll remove the check and try to inform the few out of tree guys that i'm
aware of.
Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists