[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1359358561.20444.14.camel@cr0>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:36:01 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] pktgen: support net namespace
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 22:52 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> >
> > This patch add net namespace to pktgen, so that
> > we can use pktgen in different namespaces.
>
> Skimming through this looks like a reasonable patch.
>
> I am not a fan of the number of threads, but that has nothing to do with
> correctness, and would certainly require a large change in logic to keep
> the number of threads down, which might not be a good idea.
Yeah, I noticed we would have nr_ns*nr_cpu threads after this patch,
unfortunately this is not easy to solve due to the interface of pktgen
by design.
>
>
> One small nit below.
...
> >
> > - pg_proc_dir = proc_mkdir(PG_PROC_DIR, init_net.proc_net);
> > - if (!pg_proc_dir)
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + pn->net = net;
> > + if (!pn->proc_dir) {
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This test is pointless. pn->proc_dir is allocated with kzalloc so it
> will be initially NULL and pg_net_init will be called exactly once
> per network namespace so pn->proc_dir will always be NULL here.
>
Alright... will remove it.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists