netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1359486558.15135.29.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:09:18 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	David.Choi@...rel.Com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Ping.Doong@...rel.Com, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_mll:
 Implement basic statistics

On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 13:55 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> Do not post new versions of patches as replies to other emails or
> threads, always use fresh, new list postings to post a patch.

I think replying with In-Reply-To: context is better
than starting a new thread without that In-Reply-To.

If the subject changes with version number, what
difference does it make?

Is there some case that patchwork doesn't handle well?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html