[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130130121447.GB1604@minipsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:14:47 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: inaccurate packet scheduling
Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:13:03PM CET, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote:
>On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 13:23 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>> part of the commit message says:
>> <quote>
>> The bits per second on the wire is still 5200Mb/s with new HTB
>> because qdisc accounts for packet length using skb->len, which
>> is smaller than total bytes on the wire if GSO is used. But
>> that is for another patch regardless of how time is accounted.
>> </quote>
>> I believe that is a similar problem like ours. But looks like this
>> "another patch" never got in.
>>
>
>Hmm, I thought I addressed this in
>
>commit 1def9238d4aa2146924994aa4b7dc861f03b9362
>Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>Date: Thu Jan 10 12:36:42 2013 +0000
>
> net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation
>
> One long standing problem with TSO/GSO/GRO packets is that skb->len
> doesn't represent a precise amount of bytes on wire.
>
> Headers are only accounted for the first segment.
> For TCP, thats typically 66 bytes per 1448 bytes segment missing,
> an error of 4.5 % for normal MSS value.
>
> As consequences :
>
> 1) TBF/CBQ/HTB/NETEM/... can send more bytes than the assigned limits.
> 2) Device stats are slightly under estimated as well.
>
> Fix this by taking account of headers in qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len
> computation.
>
> Packet schedulers should use qdisc pkt_len instead of skb->len for their
> bandwidth limitations, and TSO enabled devices drivers could use pkt_len
> if their statistics are not hardware assisted, and if they don't scratch
> skb->cb[] first word.
>
> Both egress and ingress paths work, thanks to commit fda55eca5a
> (net: introduce skb_transport_header_was_set()) : If GRO built
> a GSO packet, it also set the transport header for us.
>
I tried kernel with this patch in. I also ported
56b765b79e9a78dc7d3f8850ba5e5567205a3ecd to tbf. I'm getting always the
similar numbers with iperf. There must be something else needed :/
Thanks
Jiri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists