netdev - Re: ixp4xx eth broken in 3.7.0/3.8-rc5?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:34:07 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
CC:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ixp4xx eth broken in 3.7.0/3.8-rc5?

On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 19:32 -0500, Xi Wang wrote:
> On 1/29/13 7:11 PM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > A git bisect identified the following as the culprit:
> > 
> >   > From 1a4901177574083c35fafc24c4d151c2a7c7647c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >   > From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
> >   > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:25:09 +0000
> >   > Subject: [PATCH] ixp4xx_eth: avoid calling dma_pool_create() with NULL dev
> >   >
> >   > Use &port->netdev->dev instead of NULL since dma_pool_create() doesn't
> >   > allow NULL dev.
> >   >
> >   > Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
> >   > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >   > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> >   > ---
> >   >  drivers/net/ethernet/xscale/ixp4xx_eth.c |    8 +++++---
> >   >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Reverting this unbreaks ixp4xx_eth on my ixp4xx machine with kernels
> > 3.7.0 and 3.8-rc5.
> 
> Thanks.  The problem was that in init_queues(), the dma_pool_create()
> call requires a non-null dev.
> 
>   dma_pool = dma_pool_create(DRV_NAME, ??, ...);
> 
> What do you think would work here?

For DMA purposes I would expect the right device to be the parent bus
device, i.e. port->netdev->dev.parent.  The driver might also need to
set its DMA masks.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html