[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130131081645.GA14812@elgon.mountain>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:16:46 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...ux.intel.com>,
Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@...to.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfc@...1.01.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] NFC: llcp: integer underflow in nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb()
If gb_len is less than 3 it would cause an integer underflow and
possibly memory corruption in nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv().
I removed the old test for gb_len == 0. I also removed the test for
->remote_gb == NULL. It's not possible for ->remote_gb to be NULL and
we have already dereferenced ->remote_gb_len so it's too late to test.
The old test return -ENODEV but my test returns -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
index 85bc75c..746f5a2 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -549,14 +549,13 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (gb_len < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
local->remote_gb_len = gb_len;
- if (local->remote_gb == NULL || local->remote_gb_len == 0)
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (memcmp(local->remote_gb, llcp_magic, 3)) {
pr_err("MAC does not support LLCP\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists