[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1359684544.22074.6.camel@cr0>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:09:04 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] openvswitch: adjust skb_gso_segment() for rx
path
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:09 -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
> I would argue that the meanings are the same on transmit and receive
> but the values that you are likely to see differ depending on the
> path. With bridging (which includes both Open vSwitch and the bridge)
> it's very difficult to know whether you are on the transmit or receive
> path. Personally, I would just remove the warning completely.
I would keep it as it is, I fixed several RHEL kernel bugs exposed by
this warning, it is pretty useful for debugging.
...
>
> You can just drop the change in the block above and gso_send_check()
> will take care of the rest. Regardless of the state of the incoming
> packet, GSO needs the checksum to be reset to CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in
> order to work.
Right, makes sense.
>
> I think this is a different problem, unrelated to the checksum issue.
> Can you test this patch:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jesse/openvswitch.git;a=commit;h=d9d59089c43fc33eb403cbb928e56c131f191dd5
>
> I believe it should fix the problem, although there are still a few
> lingering reports that I'm trying to track down.
I will try your patch together with my updated patch.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists