[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510B2D6D.4050908@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:50:21 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: vyasevic@...hat.com
CC: Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>,
shemminger@...tta.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 01/12] bridge: Add vlan filtering infrastructure
On 01/31/2013 03:13 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 02:57 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> 2013/1/31 Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>:
>>> Adds an optional infrustructure component to bridge that would allow
>>> native vlan filtering in the bridge. Each bridge port (as well
>>> as the bridge device) now get a VLAN bitmap. Each bit in the bitmap
>>> is associated with a vlan id. This way if the bit corresponding to
>>> the vid is set in the bitmap that the packet with vid is allowed to
>>> enter and exit the port.
>>>
>>> Write access the bitmap is protected by RTNL and read access
>>> protected by RCU.
>> [...]
>>> +static int __vlan_del(struct net_port_vlans *v, u16 vid)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long first_bit;
>>> + unsigned long last_bit;
>>> +
>>> + if (!test_bit(vid, v->vlan_bitmap))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + /* Check to see if any other vlans are in this table. If this
>>> + * is the last vlan, delete the whole structure. If this is
>>> not the
>>> + * last vlan, just clear the bit.
>>> + */
>>> + first_bit = find_first_bit(v->vlan_bitmap, BR_VLAN_BITMAP_LEN);
>>> + last_bit = find_last_bit(v->vlan_bitmap, BR_VLAN_BITMAP_LEN);
>>> +
>>> + if (v->port_idx && vid) {
>>> + struct net_device *dev = vlans_to_port(v)->dev;
>>> +
>>> + if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER)
>>> + dev->netdev_ops->ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid(dev, vid);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + clear_bit(vid, v->vlan_bitmap);
>>> + if (first_bit == last_bit) {
>>
>> if (bitmap_empty(v->vlan_bitmap, BR_VLAN_BITMAP_LEN))
>
> Yeah. I didn't have the clear_bit about before, but with it
> bitmap_empty() is much better.
>
>>
>>> + if (v->port_idx) {
>>> + struct net_bridge_port *p = vlans_to_port(v);
>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(p->vlan_info, NULL);
>>> + } else {
>>> + struct net_bridge *br = vlans_to_bridge(v);
>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(br->vlan_info, NULL);
>>> + }
>>
>> You seem to use vlans_to_port/vlans_to_bridge only to get at
>> vlan_info. Maybe that could be abstracted to a single interface, or
>> even change v->parent to be a 'net_port_vlans **'?
>
> Hmm.. net_port_vlan** has appeal. I'll see if I can make it work.
So, I went about rewriting this only to realize that there is a bug in
patch 10 and I need the conversion functions to fix it.
I can't really abstract it to a single interface without adding the
whole nbp/port layer on top of the bridge device and that's overkill.
Changing to net_port_vlans** doesn't buy me anything other then obfuscation.
So I think I am going to keep the much simpler parent pointer and
conversion functions since I will need them later.
Thanks
-vlad
>
> Thanks
> -vlad
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Michał Mirosław
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists