netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V1 00/10] Mellanox Ethernet driver updates 2013-01-30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130205.153027.1413530222577302952.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:30:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	amirv@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 00/10] Mellanox Ethernet driver updates
 2013-01-30

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:08:19 +0000

> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:51 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
>> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:07:01 +0200
>> 
>> > Hi Dave,
>> > 
>> > This series contains updates to mlx4 driver.
>> > Majority of the patches are small bug fixes. Another patch is to expose through
>> > debugfs some HW resources to be used by external tools.
>> > 
>> > Patches done against net-next commit 1b13c97: "net/vxlan: Add ethtool drvinfo"
>> > 
>> > Changes from V0:
>> > - Removed patch "net/mlx4_en: Add debugfs support". Need to find a standard way
>> >   to do it, and no need to delay the other patches.
>> 
>> All applied, thanks.
> 
> The first time this series was posted (this is actually v2) I raised an
> issue with the changes to interpretation of the VLAN tag in ethtool RX
> NFC commands: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/257392/>.
> The semantics are now definitely inconsistent between sfc and mlx4_en.
> I asked Alexander what ixgbe (first implementation) does with the upper
> 4 bits, with the aim that all three implementations should be
> consistent, but I haven't had an answer to that yet.

I was hoping you guys would resolve this and post follow-on fixes
if necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html