[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51127781.2000504@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:32:17 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] interface-local multicast escapes the local node
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:07:39PM +0100, Erik Hugne wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:12:48PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>>> Fixing the output path should be relatively straightforward, please test
>>> the following patch.
>>
>> Tested OK.
>>
>>> Looking at the input path, I think there is also no input protection
>>> for ff01::/16 addresses from the wire if you bind such an address.
>>
>> Yes, this needs to be filtered on the input side aswell.
>
> This patch should do the trick. Perhaps you could also take it for a test
> drive? Thanks!
>
> [PATCH net-next] ipv6: don't accept node local multicast traffic from the wire
>
> Cc: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> index 4ac5bf3..a2f71d2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,16 @@ int ipv6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt
> if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&hdr->saddr))
> goto err;
>
> + /*
> + * RFC4291 2.7
> + * Interface-Local scope spans only a single interface on a node
> + * and is useful only for loopback transmission of multicast.
> + */
> + if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&hdr->daddr) &&
> + IPV6_ADDR_MC_SCOPE(&hdr->daddr) <= IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_NODELOCAL &&
> + skb->pkt_type != PACKET_LOOPBACK)
> + goto err;
> +
> skb->transport_header = skb->network_header + sizeof(*hdr);
> IP6CB(skb)->nhoff = offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, nexthdr);
NAK.
Well, do you have relevant RFC?
RFC4291 says that we should drop ff00::/16, but not ff01::/16.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists