netdev - Re: IP_FREEBIND and binding to in-use addr:ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5113F5A6.80500@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:42:46 -0800
From:	Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>
To:	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IP_FREEBIND and binding to in-use addr:ports

On 02/06/2013 04:47 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
> OK, this is weird:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908368
>
> It appears you can listen on the same address:port if you do it from a
> different iscsi target, or even a different tpg (so there are no
> configfs name collisions). I believe this is because we are setting
> IP_FREEBIND sockopt, so we can configure listening on iscsi portals (aka
> ip:port) before the IP is assigned.
>
> from ip(7):
> IP_FREEBIND (since Linux 2.4)
> If enabled, this boolean option allows binding to an IP address that is
> nonlocal or does not (yet) exist.  This permits listening on a socket,
> without requiring the underlying network interface or the specified
> dynamic IP address to be up at the time that the application is trying
> to bind to it.  This option is the per-socket equivalent of the
> ip_nonlocal_bind /proc interface described below.
>
> This doesn't say anything about if the address:port is already in use.
> Dave/netdev, should the network stack be returning an error when
> attempting to bind to an address:port already in use even if IP_FREEBIND
> is set, or should the caller be checking for this before trying to
> kernel_bind()?
>
> Or is something else the issue?

Looks like IP_FREEBIND doesn't make a difference. More shortly. -- Andy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html