[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALZVapn-oF2L1BB855x26XGjzP6wYyT93jcJB0X3TcmFE8AxYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:27:30 +0100
From: Javier Domingo <javierdo1@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Softirqs without captured packets
Can you tell me something about the traces I introduced?
I tried to insert the trace the cleanest way possible. I patched
dev.c, in the measurement places and tried to make the module the more
independent I could. It makes the measure with sched_clock() and in
each round, it sums up the work done.
I have supposed that that softirq is just for capturing packets, so
that is why I asked my first question,
Waiting your reply,
Javier Domingo
2013/2/8 Javier Domingo <javierdo1@...il.com>:
> This is the patch to enable the tracer module, programed for version
> v3.6 in the mainline.
>
> It is part of a bigger project I am trying to release, but I am not
> still authorized to release other's source code. The sourcecode
> contained here is just mine, and I release it under GPLv3.
>
> Hope it works without any modification! git apply worked for me.
>
> Cheers and thank you for your attention,
> Javier Domingo
>
>
> 2013/2/8 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> From: Javier Domingo <javierdo1@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:02:41 +0100
>>
>>> Sorry, I think I misexplained,
>>>
>>> I wanted to say net's receive softirq: net_rx_action, not softirqs in general.
>>
>> If you don't show us your code we have to guess all sorts of things
>> like this.
>>
>> Don't expect much help until you post your tracer module.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists