[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360484188.20362.11.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:16:28 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Javier Domingo <javierdo1@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Softirqs without captured packets
Please do not top post on netdev
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 04:02 +0100, Javier Domingo wrote:
> Well, that explains why the 0 :D. I was getting nut. Any way, does
> that happen in e1000e or tg3 drivers? If not, then there is still
> without explanation.
>
The answer is yes.
> Respecting the low numbers, I will do some futher stress tests, but
> this measures where done pinging the computer at 0.001 interval:
>
> ping -i 0.0001 <computer ip>
>
> And received packets where at much, 3 per softirq. Also, I tried
> opening an ftp download session but didn't get much high numbers
> (1Gbps link).
>
Machine is fast enough, thats all.
> When I tried this with the injection done by a dag (hardware injector)
> there were strange results because thought the 0s where explained, the
> were appearing thought the rest of softirqs where about 280+-50.
Have you read this part of net_rx_action() ?
unsigned long time_limit = jiffies + 2;
/* If softirq window is exhuasted then punt.
* Allow this to run for 2 jiffies since which will allow
* an average latency of 1.5/HZ.
*/
if (unlikely(budget <= 0 || time_after(jiffies, time_limit)))
goto softnet_break;
This means your machine handles 280+50 packets per 1.5/HZ
(Plus the hidden TX completions...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists