netdev - Re: [Qemu-devel] tap devices not receiving packets from a bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D40E1487-27E9-40B3-B007-085B432E5600@dlhnet.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:11:45 +0100
From:	Peter Lieven <pl@...net.de>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tap devices not receiving packets from a bridge


Am 12.02.2013 um 10:54 schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>:

> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> []
>> 
>> Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoting just a bit? ;)
>> 
>>>>> If have set this option for 2 weeks now and not seen this problem again.
>>>>> How does this flag work with the recently added tap multiqueue support?
>> 
>>>> This will be the only option in 3.8.
>> 
>>> Ok, but wouldn`t it be good to set it in qemu for kernels <3.8?
>> 
>> I'd say for kernels without mq support, not for <3.8, right? :)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> /mjt
> 
> It's harmless to always set this flag, on 3.8 it does nothing.

And kernels <3.8 do not have multi queue support?

Peter

> 
> -- 
> MST

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html