[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360687250.6884.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:40:50 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, j.vimal@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v5 11/11] act_police: remove <=mtu check for
gso skbs
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 11:12 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> This check made bigger packets incorrectly dropped. Remove this
> limitation for gso skbs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> ---
> net/sched/act_police.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_police.c b/net/sched/act_police.c
> index 823463a..2dba297 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_police.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_police.c
> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> return police->tcf_action;
> }
>
> - if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) <= police->tcfp_mtu) {
> + if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) <= police->tcfp_mtu || skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> if (!police->rate_present) {
> spin_unlock(&police->tcf_lock);
> return police->tcfp_result;
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> police->tcfp_burst);
> if (police->peak_present) {
> ptoks = toks + police->tcfp_ptoks;
> - if (ptoks > police->tcfp_mtu_ptoks)
> + if (ptoks > police->tcfp_mtu_ptoks && !skb_is_gso(skb))
> ptoks = police->tcfp_mtu_ptoks;
> ptoks -= (s64) psched_l2t_ns(&police->peak,
> qdisc_pkt_len(skb));
Same remark here : This chunks looks wrong to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists