[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511B7474.3040201@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:09:40 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: <sean.hefty@...el.com>
CC: <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] rdma/cm: Update port reservation to support AF_IB
On 22/01/2013 23:56, sean.hefty@...el.com wrote:
> The AF_IB uses a 64-bit service id (SID), which the
> user can control through the use of a mask. The rdma_cm
> will assign values to the unmasked portions of the SID
> based on the selected port space and port number.
Something here I am not sure to follow -- if AF_IB consumers are allowed
to provide 64-bit SID, how
the IB port space is expressed in their SIDs?
Wouldn't it make sense to use a simpler approach that has a dedicated
IB_PS in the port space
portion of the RDMA-CM IP IBTA annex and let the consumer provide 16
bits for their part of the SID?
Or.
> Because the IB spec divides the SID range into several regions,
> a SID/mask combination may fall into one of the existing
> port space ranges as defined by the RDMA CM IP Annex. Map
> the AF_IB SID to the correct RDMA port space.
> [...]
> --- a/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ enum rdma_port_space {
> RDMA_PS_UDP = 0x0111,
> };
>
> +#define RDMA_IB_IP_PS_MASK 0xFFFFFFFFFFFF0000ULL
> +#define RDMA_IB_IP_PS_TCP 0x0000000001060000ULL
> +#define RDMA_IB_IP_PS_UDP 0x0000000001110000ULL
> +#define RDMA_IB_IP_PS_IB 0x00000000013F0000ULL
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists