[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511B8D62.3050508@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:56:02 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: <sean.hefty@...el.com>
CC: <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] rdma/cm: define native IB address
On 22/01/2013 23:56, sean.hefty@...el.com wrote:
> +
> +struct sockaddr_ib {
> + unsigned short int sib_family; /* AF_IB */
> + __be16 sib_pkey;
> + __be32 sib_flowinfo;
> + struct ib_addr sib_addr;
> + __be64 sib_sid;
> + __be64 sib_sid_mask;
> + __u64 sib_scope_id;
> +};
just a nit, maybe reorder the fields to better cope with their IPv6
buddies (where there is
such) from sockaddr_in6?
Also I see that both IPv6 header and IB GRH have a traffic class field
which is skipped in both
cases for the related sockaddr_ structure, not sure why, is this
something the kernel stack decides on and uses but not available for
applications to read/modify?
struct sockaddr_in6 {
unsigned short int sin6_family; /* AF_INET6 */
__be16 sin6_port; /* Transport layer port
# */
__be32 sin6_flowinfo; /* IPv6 flow information */
struct in6_addr sin6_addr; /* IPv6 address */
__u32 sin6_scope_id; /* scope id (new in
RFC2553) */
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists