[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kfi5k6$1mq$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:01:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how to handle bonding failover when using a bridge over the bond?
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 at 00:30 GMT, Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com> wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 06:02 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> The bond doesn't track all of the MACs that go through it, but
>> the bridge presumably does, and could respond to the FAILOVER notifier
>> with something to notify the switch that the port assignments for the
>> various MACs have changed.
>
> That would probably make sense. I've added the bridging folks, maybe
> they'll have a suggestion how this sort of thing should be handled.
>
It is already handled. When BONDING_FAILOVER is triggered and the MAC has
been changed, NETDEV_CHANGEADDR is issued too, then bridge will capture
it and update its fdb:
case NETDEV_CHANGEADDR:
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_fdb_changeaddr(p, dev->dev_addr);
changed_addr = br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
if (changed_addr)
call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEADDR, br->dev);
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists