[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360859547.6884.51.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:32:27 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Pöhn <sebastian.poehn@...glemail.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: tuntap: Overload handling
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 12:50 +0100, Sebastian Pöhn wrote:
> I am having a look on the tun driver to realize an userspace network
> driver ( TAP + UIO ). Maybe that's not the use-case tun is intended
> for.
>
> What I've noticed is that in tun.c Line 741
>
> static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* Limit the number of packets queued by dividing txq length with the
> * number of queues.
> */
> if (skb_queue_len(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue)
> >= dev->tx_queue_len / tun->numqueues)
> goto drop;
>
> If a frame can not be tx it is dropped by the driver.
> Wouldn't it be more correct to netif_tx_stop_queue() so that packet
> drops are performed by the overlying traffic control code?
>
> Of course this is not very likely in virtual environments but as soon
> as any real network hop is involved it could be important.
>
> (I also had a look on some two year old version of tun.c. There
> queue/tx stopping was done correctly.)
You should ask Michael S. Tsirkin, as he removed the flow control
in commit 5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
(tun: only queue packets on device)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists