[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360995918.19353.56.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:25:18 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next (V2)] ipv6: Queue fragments per interface
for multicast/link-local addresses.
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 14:49 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> We should queue fragments for the same link-local address on
> different interfaces (e.g. fe80::1%eth0 and fe80::1%eth1) to the
> different queue, because of nature of addressing architecture.
>
> Similarly, we should queue fragments for multicast on different
> interface to the different queue. This is okay because
> application joins group on speicific interface, and multicast
> traffic is expected only on that interface.
>
> CC: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
> CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> ---
I would definitely ask advice from Patrick & Pablo on this patch.
If a router uses several links in aggregation (but no bonding dev), we
might break fragmentation/reassembly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists