netdev - Re: Universal tap device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:25:06 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Universal tap device

On Saturday 16 February 2013, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:46:25PM CET, jengelh@...i.de wrote:
> >On Saturday 2013-02-16 15:01, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >
> >>Hi all.                                                                  
> >>                                                                         
> >>Looking at macvtap and thinking about the tap solutions in general,
> >>I think it would be handly to have some universal tap device.
> >
> >As in, allowing tuntap to register as an rx_handler for arbitrary
> >devices?
> 
> Essentially yes, but I was thinking without the actual netdev:
> not eth0 -> tap0 -> chardev
> but eth0 -> chardev
> 
> Not sure though if that is easily doable..

Isn't that the same as setting up macvtap in PASSTHRU mode?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html