[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512045EA.9090309@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:52:26 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, brian.haley@...com,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] ipv6: introduce new type ipv6_addr_props
to hold ipv6 address type and scope
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:31:52AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
>>>> -extern int __ipv6_addr_type(const struct in6_addr *addr);
>>>> -static inline int ipv6_addr_type(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>>>> +struct ipv6_addr_props {
>>>> + u16 type;
>>>> + s16 scope;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +extern struct ipv6_addr_props __ipv6_addr_props(const struct in6_addr *addr);
>>>> +static inline unsigned int ipv6_addr_type(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>>>> {
>>>> - return __ipv6_addr_type(addr) & 0xffff;
>>>> + return __ipv6_addr_props(addr).type;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static inline int ipv6_addr_scope(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>>>> {
>>>> - return __ipv6_addr_type(addr) & IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK;
>>>> + return __ipv6_addr_props(addr).scope;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> NAK. This does not return correct value as before.
>>> If you are going to covert this, please do not try to
>>> change usage of inlines.
>>
>> I meant
>>
>> struct ipv6_addrtype {
>> __u16 type;
>> __s16 scope;
>> };
>>
>> struct ipv6_addrtype __ipv6_addr_type(const struct in6_addr *addr);
>> int ipv6_addr_type(const struct in6_addr *addr)
>> {
>> return __ipv6_addr_type(addr).type;
>> }
>>
>> And most users should not be touched except for it type name
>> (int => struct addrtype).
>
> Sorry, I am a bit confused. The missing '& IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK' is clearly a
> bug. I implied a bitmask for the IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_* macros. But I don't
> understand to what you do refer in your second mail.
>
No, return __ipv6_addr_type(addr).type & IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK, see?
You have changed too many things in a single patch.
Please do not try to change function arguments, and so on
e.g. if original takes int by __ipv6_addr_type() value, please leave
it semantics as is.
I think you can concentrate on your original work for multicast/scoping
issues first.
Thanks.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists