[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361201422.23152.154.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:30:22 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, rjw@...k.pl,
namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/45] CPU hotplug: stop_machine()-free CPU hotplug
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 11:58 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> My tests have been done without cpuidle because i have some issues
> with function tracer and cpuidle
>
> But the cpu hotplug and cpuidle work well when I run the tests without
> enabling the function tracer
>
I know suspend and resume has issues with function tracing (because it
makes things like calling smp_processor_id() crash the system), but I'm
unaware of issues with hotplug itself. Could be some of the same issues.
Can you give me more details, I'll try to investigate it.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists