[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D76AF9B3DDF5FF49833AC0A1396549060314FC1B@s554.babiel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:38:25 +0100
From: "Stefan Behte" <s.behte@...iel.com>
To: "Oleg" <sysoleg@...dex.ru>,
"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Fujinaka, Todd" <todd.fujinaka@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Subject: AW: AW: ixgbe: Regression, unsupported SFP+ modules on 10Gbit/s X520 NIC no longer work with allow_unsupported_sfp=1
Hi,
printk("DEBUG comp_codes_1g: %u\n", comp_codes_1g);
results in:
Feb 18 18:36:09 n128 kernel: [26043.714408] DEBUG comp_codes_1g: 2
Best regards,
Stefan Behte
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Oleg [mailto:sysoleg@...dex.ru]
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Februar 2013 18:09
An: Stefan Behte; Tantilov, Emil S; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Skidmore, Donald C; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Fujinaka, Todd; Ronciak, John
Betreff: Re: AW: ixgbe: Regression, unsupported SFP+ modules on 10Gbit/s X520 NIC no longer work with allow_unsupported_sfp=1
18.02.2013, 16:13, "Stefan Behte" <s.behte@...iel.com>:
>> 1. What is the SFP+ module you are using (make/model/type)?
>
> The module is a TP-Link TL-SM311LS 1000BASE-LX LC.
I've seen some transceivers that have "Code for electronic or
optical compatibility" EEPROM field (see SFF-8472) set to
all-zeroes. Maybe this is your case. Could you please printk
value of comp_codes_1g variable somewhere?
--
wbr, Oleg.
"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
Alan Moore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists