| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1361210344-14907-3-git-send-email-nikolay@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:59:04 +0100
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bonding: fix bond_release_all inconsistencies
This patch fixes the following inconsistencies in bond_release_all:
- IFF_BONDING flag is not stripped from slaves
- MTU is not restored
- no netdev notifiers are sent
Instead of trying to keep bond_release and bond_release_all in sync
I think we can re-use bond_release as the environment for calling it
is correct (RTNL is held). I have been running tests for the past
week and they came out successful. The only way for bond_release to fail
is for the slave to be attached in a different bond or to not be a slave
but that cannot happen as RTNL is held and no slave manipulations can be
achieved.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 106 ++--------------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 94c1534..fcfc880 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2140,113 +2140,17 @@ static int bond_release_and_destroy(struct net_device *bond_dev,
/*
* This function releases all slaves.
*/
-static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
+static void bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
- struct slave *slave;
- struct net_device *slave_dev;
- struct sockaddr addr;
-
- write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
-
- netif_carrier_off(bond_dev);
if (bond->slave_cnt == 0)
- goto out;
-
- bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
- bond->primary_slave = NULL;
- bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
-
- while ((slave = bond->first_slave) != NULL) {
- /* Inform AD package of unbinding of slave
- * before slave is detached from the list.
- */
- if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
- bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave);
-
- slave_dev = slave->dev;
- bond_detach_slave(bond, slave);
-
- /* now that the slave is detached, unlock and perform
- * all the undo steps that should not be called from
- * within a lock.
- */
- write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
-
- /* unregister rx_handler early so bond_handle_frame wouldn't
- * be called for this slave anymore.
- */
- netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
- synchronize_net();
-
- if (bond_is_lb(bond)) {
- /* must be called only after the slave
- * has been detached from the list
- */
- bond_alb_deinit_slave(bond, slave);
- }
-
- bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- bond_del_vlans_from_slave(bond, slave_dev);
-
- /* If the mode USES_PRIMARY, then we should only remove its
- * promisc and mc settings if it was the curr_active_slave, but that was
- * already taken care of above when we detached the slave
- */
- if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
- /* unset promiscuity level from slave */
- if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC)
- dev_set_promiscuity(slave_dev, -1);
-
- /* unset allmulti level from slave */
- if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
- dev_set_allmulti(slave_dev, -1);
-
- /* flush master's mc_list from slave */
- netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev);
- bond_mc_list_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
- }
-
- bond_upper_dev_unlink(bond_dev, slave_dev);
-
- slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
-
- /* close slave before restoring its mac address */
- dev_close(slave_dev);
-
- if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
- /* restore original ("permanent") mac address*/
- memcpy(addr.sa_data, slave->perm_hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
- addr.sa_family = slave_dev->type;
- dev_set_mac_address(slave_dev, &addr);
- }
-
- kfree(slave);
-
- /* re-acquire the lock before getting the next slave */
- write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
- }
-
- eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
- bond->dev_addr_from_first = true;
-
- if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) {
- pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n",
- bond_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
- pr_warning("%s: When re-adding slaves, make sure the bond's HW address matches its VLANs'.\n",
- bond_dev->name);
- }
-
+ return;
+ while (bond->first_slave != NULL)
+ bond_release(bond_dev, bond->first_slave->dev);
pr_info("%s: released all slaves\n", bond_dev->name);
-out:
- write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
-
- bond_compute_features(bond);
-
- return 0;
+ return;
}
/*
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists