lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130218.150001.165597927582810425.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:00:01 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	festevam@...il.com
Cc:	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawn.guo@...aro.org, marex@...x.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fabio.estevam@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: fec: Do a sanity check on the gpio number

From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:51:49 -0300

> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:47 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
>> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:29:24 -0300
>>
>>> Since commit 372e722ea4d (gpiolib: use descriptors internally) the following
>>> warning is seen on a mx28evk board:
>>
>> [davem@drr linux]$ git describe 372e722ea4d
>> fatal: Not a valid object name 372e722ea4d
>> [davem@drr linux]$
>>
>> That commit ID doesn't exist in any tree I have access to.
> 
> It exists in linux-next.

linux-next commits are not valid to reference if they are not
either in the target tree where your patch belongs or Linus's
tree.

And if the change that causes the change to be needed doesn't even
exist in my tree or Linus's upstream, your "fix" has no business in my
tree either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ