[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130218124104.26245.44272.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:11:04 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@...k.pl, sbw@....edu,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 20/46] net: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU
offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f64e439..5421f96 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3089,7 +3089,7 @@ int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
int cpu;
- preempt_disable();
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
rcu_read_lock();
cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
@@ -3099,7 +3099,7 @@ int netif_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
rcu_read_unlock();
- preempt_enable();
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
} else
#endif
{
@@ -3498,6 +3498,7 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
int cpu, ret;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
rcu_read_lock();
cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
@@ -3505,9 +3506,11 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (cpu >= 0) {
ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return ret;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
#endif
return __netif_receive_skb(skb);
@@ -3887,6 +3890,7 @@ static void net_rps_action_and_irq_enable(struct softnet_data *sd)
local_irq_enable();
/* Send pending IPI's to kick RPS processing on remote cpus. */
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
while (remsd) {
struct softnet_data *next = remsd->rps_ipi_next;
@@ -3895,6 +3899,7 @@ static void net_rps_action_and_irq_enable(struct softnet_data *sd)
&remsd->csd, 0);
remsd = next;
}
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
} else
#endif
local_irq_enable();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists