[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A1844D0099DF@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:30:57 +0000
From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [next:akpm 16/587]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231:2: error: call to
'__compiletime_assert_6235' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
failed: SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN +
IGB_TS_HDR_LEN + ETH...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:27 PM
> To: Wu, Fengguang
> Cc: Daniel Santos; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [next:akpm 16/587]
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231:2: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_6235' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD +
> NET_IP_ALIGN + IGB_TS_HDR_LEN + ETH...
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:27:22 +0800
> kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> akpm
> > head: ae9da2a24a80423b8dbda9c5a72674ce6e7861be
> > commit: f7d7e38e6df399b2af7f04c177054abdd744a077 [16/587] bug.h,
> compiler.h: Introduce compiletime_assert & BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG
> > config: make ARCH=s390 allmodconfig
> >
> > All error/warnings:
> >
> > In function 'igb_build_rx_buffer',
> > inlined from 'igb_clean_rx_irq' at
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6705:8:
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231:2: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_6235' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD +
> NET_IP_ALIGN + IGB_TS_HDR_LEN + ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
> >
> > vim +/__compiletime_assert_6235 +6231
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> >
> > 6225 #endif
> > 6226
> > 6227 /* If we spanned a buffer we have a huge mess so test for it
> */
> > 6228 BUG_ON(unlikely(!igb_test_staterr(rx_desc,
> E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)));
> > 6229
> > 6230 /* Guarantee this function can be used by verifying buffer
> sizes */
> > > 6231
> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) <
> (NET_SKB_PAD +
> > 6232
> NET_IP_ALIGN +
> > 6233
> IGB_TS_HDR_LEN +
> > 6234
> ETH_FRAME_LEN +
> >
>
> That BUILD_BUG_ON() triggers without Daniel's patches applied as well:
>
> CC [M] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.o
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c: In function
> 'igb_build_rx_buffer':
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231: error: size of array 'type
> name' is negative
>
> I suspect that driver is busted on s390. Dunno why. Here's what cpp emits:
>
>
> s390 allmodconfig:
>
> bool __cond = !(!(((2048) - (((sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + (256 - 1)) &
> ~(256 - 1))) < (32 + 2 + 16 + 1514 + 4)));
>
>
> x86_64 allmodconfig:
>
> bool __cond = !(!(((2048) - (((sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + ((1 <<
> (6)) - 1)) & ~((1 << (6)) - 1))) < (({ typeof(32) _max1 = (32); typeof((1
> << (6))) _max2 = ((1 << (6))); (void) (&_max1 == &_max2); _max1 > _max2 ?
> _max1 : _max2; }) + 0 + 16 + 1514 + 4)));
>
>
> I doubt if anyone will be running this driver on s390, but I guess we
> should work out why it broke.
Adding Intel wired ethernet developers mailing list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists