netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: Split from and expires field in dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <512497EE.8000100@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:31:26 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: Split from and expires field in dst_entry out
 of union [net-next]

On 2013/02/20 15:00, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 14:33 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> 
>> How can we?
>> one usage of rt6_update_expires and rt6_set_expires
>> is changing rt6->dst.from to rt6->dst.expires, we should release the
>> already holded reference of rt6->dst.from.
>>
> 
> Just don't union the two fields, as Neil did.
> 
> Setting the dst.expires value should not change dst.from at all.
> 

Get it,it looks good to me.we can make sure dst->from doesn't
being operated at same time.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html