[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130220.200502.1241369422255314068.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:05:02 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: chris.friesen@...band.com
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why is it not allowed to add a new socket protocol family as
an external module?
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:44:50 -0600
> On 02/20/2013 05:23 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:13 -0600
>> Chris Friesen<chris.friesen@...band.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was just wondering why the kernel doesn't allow a new network
>>> protocol
>>> family to be loaded as as a kernel module built outside the kernel
>>> source tree.
>
>> If you want an answer, to the question, use a tool like cscope and
>> learn to read the kernel code. There are several tables of pointers
>> sized by NPROTO.
>
> That's a bit insulting, don't you think?
Absolutely not insulting at all.
The list is _NOT_ a place to go when you're just too damn lazy to take
the 10 seconds it would have taken to answer your question with a
quick NPROTO grep on the kernel sources.
Stephen's response to you was therefore %100 appropriate, and I would
have told you likewise if I had been the first to respond.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists