| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <512BB8A5.60103@mojatatu.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:16:53 -0500 From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> To: Petri Gynther <petri.gynther@...il.com> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to hairpin two Ethernet interfaces together (L2 hub/repeater mode)? Look at tc action redirect. Add it to ingress of eth0 to match everything and send out on eth1. cheers, jamal On 13-02-22 07:10 PM, Petri Gynther wrote: > Hi netdev: > > I'd like to hairpin two Ethernet interfaces together (e.g. eth0 and > eth1) so that any frame received on eth0 is forwarded as-is to eth1 > and vice versa. > > Does Linux networking code support this? I've looked at the bridging > code, but it doesn't seem to do this (at least trivially). > Specifically, when eth0 and eth1 are added to bridge, unicast frames > destined to eth0 (or eth1) MAC address end up to the bridge interface > for local consumption, rather than being flooded to other ports on the > bridge. > > Any trivial solutions to this? Can Linux bridge be configured in L2 > hub/repeater mode so that it simply floods every Rx frame to all other > ports of the bridge? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists