[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512E5BBD.2040803@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:17:17 +0200
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling
On 27/02/2013 20:47, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>>
>> Have you looked at netmap? Seems like a cleaner user API for this.
>>
> That might be a bit orthogonal to this. I believe the intent it to
> allow spin polling from socket calls without API change.
Exactly.
BTW, an interesting alternative to netmap would be to map a VF into
userspace. (you would need to pre-allocate DMA memory regions and all of
that RDMA-like stuff)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists