netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mlx4: Use default fdb handlers when not multifunction.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <512EDCC7.8050207@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:27:51 -0800
From:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mlx4: Use default fdb handlers when not multifunction.

On 2/27/2013 9:46 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Allow the use of ndo_dflt_fdb_<add|del|dump> when the
> adapter is not configured with virtual functins (!mlx4_is_mfunc())
> This allows proper IFF_UNICAST_FLT support and allows for
> additional handling by the driver if needed.
>
> CC: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c |   12 +++---------
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
> index 5385474..5732025 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
> @@ -1934,7 +1934,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],

Amir are the default ops good enough here?

>   	int err;
>
>   	if (!mlx4_is_mfunc(mdev))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return ndo_dflt_fdb_add(ndm, tb, dev, addr, flags);
>
>   	/* Hardware does not support aging addresses, allow only
>   	 * permanent addresses if ndm_state is given
> @@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm,
>   	int err;
>
>   	if (!mlx4_is_mfunc(mdev))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr);
>
>   	if (ndm->ndm_state && !(ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT)) {
>   		en_info(priv, "Del FDB only supports static addresses\n");
> @@ -1989,13 +1989,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>   			    struct netlink_callback *cb,
>   			    struct net_device *dev, int idx)
>   {

same comment here. Don't define this op and we get the same behavior?



.John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html