[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5135BC3F.8070507@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:34:55 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn: checkng length to be sure not memory overflow
On 03/05/2013 03:20 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> 于 2013年02月28日 21:43, Jiri Slaby 写道:
>>
>> Nah, there *are* still people using ISDN.
>>
>
> ok, thanks.
>
> it seems, we need maintaining ISDN:
> need fix bugs.
> need not add new features.
> need keep current features no touch.
>
>
>> No, we cannot be sure that a user gives us less than that. Your patch
>> just throws the rest to fix that overflow, right? What I'm saying I
>> wouldn't fix more than that.
>
> what you said is: this patch need improving, is it correct ?
> if it is correct.
> I still prefer to throw the rest contents (but need improving, too)
> for maintaining, we need fix bug, but not need add new features
> so what we should do:
> a) fix the bug (should not memory overflow)
> b) keep the original buffer length no touch
> it is not sizeof(cmd.parm.cmsg.para) - 2)
> it should be sizeof(cmd.param) - sizeof(cmd.param.cmsg) + sizeof(cmd.param.cmsg.para) - 2
> c) need complete the relative document to export the limitation.
>
> is it ok ?
Yes, it is -- just fix the bug with minimal effort.
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists