netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/8] netback: don't bind kthread to cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:04:28 +0000
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	<wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"annie.li@...cle.com" <annie.li@...cle.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/8] netback: don't bind kthread to cpu

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:56 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:30:10PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 20:51 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:00:02PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > The initialization process makes an assumption that the online cpus are
> > > > numbered from 0 to xen_netbk_group_nr-1,  which is not always true.
> > > 
> > > And xen_netbk_group_nr is num_online_cpus()?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > > So under what conditions does this change? Is this when the CPU hotplug
> > > is involved and the CPUs go offline? In which case should there be a
> > 
> > Yes, the hotplug path.
> > 
> > > CPU hotplug notifier to re-bind the workers are appropiate?
> 
> ?
> Can't that option be explored?

Thinking about it. Should be doable.


Wei.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html