lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130307.181527.390191009324148471.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:15:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	tparkin@...alix.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] udp: don't rereference dst_entry dev pointer on rcv

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:47:24 -0800

> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 22:36 +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:
>> When a fragmented IP packet is queued during device teardown, it is possible
>> for the reassembled packet to hit the UDP rcv path with a NULL dst_entry dev
>> pointer.  Drop such packets to prevent an oops.
>> ---
>>  net/ipv4/udp.c |    3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> index 0a073a2..c38a4b1 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> @@ -1700,6 +1700,9 @@ int __udp4_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udp_table *udptable,
>>  		return __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(net, skb, uh,
>>  				saddr, daddr, udptable);
>>  
>> +	if (skb_dst(skb)->dev == NULL)
>> +		goto drop;
>> +
>>  	sk = __udp4_lib_lookup_skb(skb, uh->source, uh->dest, udptable);
>>  
>>  	if (sk != NULL) {
> 
> 
> Hmm... couldnt it be tested in reassembly layer instead ?
> 
> Why is it specific to UDP ?

Furthermore, when devices are unregistered we set the route's device
pointer to point to the loopback device, not NULL, exactly to avoid
this kind of problem.

I don't see anything in our generic DST handler nor the ipv4 specific
route handling, that would set dst->dev to NULL.

You really have to show us how this can actually happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ